The Common Camera Types - Good or Bad?

Dear Viewers and Fellow Photographers,

We all know the disappointing feeling victims worldwide get when they buy any camera which they are not pleased with and don't do what they want it to. I am unable to list all the cameras I recommend, or even, I don't recommend, but it is a good thing to be aware. This selection of cameras are ones which can be good and bad.

http://demo4.magentocommerce.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/a/r/argus_5.jpg

The type of camera shown above is highly unrecommended if you want to do real photography. Cameras which are the worst of their range can have worse image quality than phones like the HTC One. In fact, not all of these types of cameras are useless; if you get well known companies such as Nikon or Canon, go to the most expensive camera of this sort, and (almost certainly it will be too expensive) cancel out from up there the features you don't need. These types of cameras don't work well at night as their flash makes the picture Over Exposed and are only suitable for still day trips where there is a lot of natural light. Indoors or at night, movement at any setting on these cameras don't work.

Also, companies like FujiFilm have a lot of quality range in their equipment. You can get really bad cameras for a relatively high price if you don't look carefully. Recommended items from FujiFilm are things like half-SLR, half-digital cameras called CSCs. The new X-10 is a good addition, however there is an issue with a white disc appearing on the viewfinder/screen. Make sure you research properly reviews of customers which have previously used the camera you want, and don't rush choices.

http://attach.forum.ge/post-58-1368199538.jpg

The next type of camera is the misleading digital camera which looks like one which could be used as a professional camera. Usually, if you buy a camera of this sort for a high price then you will get a camera with high mega pixels and good daylight landscape photography and you could end up with almost brilliant macro photos in natural light. This type of camera is highly unrecommended if you are searching for a good low light camera, and one that lets you take extremely imaginative photos. Also, in this camera you get a lot of noise in the picture, which makes your photo look digitised and very unnatural. I have this sort of camera, a FujiFilm, and it was a great camera for taking close ups in the daylight, however not perfect for indoor parties etc.

http://www.dcresource.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/gallery_large/reviews/sony-alpha-nex-7/camera-front-angled.jpg

The camera I was talking about a few sentences back, the CSC's, are for people who want a small, but professional camera. These cameras are sometimes called Mirrorless Cameras and are all rounders. It is great for experimental photography but don't have the perfect feel of a SLR. A CSC could be very good, however some of them are not the best. The best ranges for these sorts of cameras are the expensive Sony Alpha, FujiFilm X, Lumix G and Olympus OM-D. If you buy any sort of these type of cameras they would usually be good, but don't take any chances. The rapidly rising Samsung NX series have had some doubts put up, but in fact they are pretty good. These cameras have a high megapixel count, which means they have a bigger sensor. Also, you can buy different lenses, which means the lens can be taken off just like SLRs, however the only draw back is that the series has there only special lens range which can be pretty small, but for good photography, it is enough. Also you can order a special lens you wish to have by good lens makers in the market, but this is extremely expensive.
These are the most common type of Cameras, and I hope you have got a feel for what they each are like, their positives and negatives and what camera would suit what occasion.

Yours truly,
Snapography.